AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core 4800+ processor 2.5 GHz Box

Login or signup for Full Icecat
to access all product specs
Edit this data-sheet
Search similar products
  • Brand : AMD
  • Product name : Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core 4800+
  • Product code : ADO4800DDBOX
  • Category : Processors
  • Data-sheet quality : created/standardized by Icecat
  • Product views : 22775
  • Info modified on : 21 Oct 2020 09:42:31
  • Long product name AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core 4800+ processor 2.5 GHz Box :

    Athlon 64 X2 Dual-Core 4800+

  • Short summary description AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core 4800+ processor 2.5 GHz Box :

    AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core 4800+, AMD Athlon X2, Socket AM2, 65 nm, AMD, 2.5 GHz, 2000 MHz

  • Long summary description AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core 4800+ processor 2.5 GHz Box :

    AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core 4800+. Processor family: AMD Athlon X2, Processor socket: Socket AM2, Processor lithography: 65 nm

More>>> <<<Less
Report mistake
Distributors
Country Distributor
1 distributor(s)
Reviews
Updated:
2011-07-30 03:08:27
Average rating:82
Uk has collected 4 expert reviews for AMD Athlon™ 64 X2 Dual-Core 4800+ processor 2.5 GHz Box and the average expert rating is 82 of 100. The average score reflects the expert community’s view on this product. Click below and use Uk to see all ratings, product awards and conclusions.
Read the full review
pcstats.com
Updated:
2011-07-30 03:08:18
Average rating:84
Today the money is with 65nm SOI processor manufacturing, and with the AMD Athlon64 X2 4800+ the company has finally done the die shrink.
Read the full review
Bcchardware.com
Updated:
2011-07-30 03:08:21
Average rating:80
AMD has been struggling lately due to the overwhelming success of Intels Core 2 Duo series of processor for the desktop and mobile market. Intel successfully made the move to a 65nm manufacturing process many months ago, and it appears that AMD is...
  • Good Price/Performance, Overclocks well, Stock speed power consumption a mere 65W, Good choice for enthusiasts that want 6000+ performance with a smaller price tag.
  • Reported slower cache latency, 65nm process doesnt add anything exciting...
  • We didnt publish any benchmarks of the processor overclock because they are almost identical to the 6000+ X2 processor that we reviewed last month. At 3.0GHz (6000+ Stock, 4800+ O/C) we see performance numbers that are so close, it is too boring to...
Read the full review
xbitlabs.com
Updated:
2011-07-30 03:08:24
Average rating:0
It’s exactly one year since the first processor manufactured with 65nm technology was released. Intel pioneered the use of the new tech process on the borderline of the years of 2005 and 2006 with its Presler core that implemented the NetBurst archi...
  • The new 65nm Brisbane core can’t provoke a revolution on the CPU market. From an ordinary user’s point of view, the processors based on the new core differ but little from their predecessors. The new core doesn’t feature any improvements...
firingsquad.com
Updated:
2011-07-30 03:08:26
Average rating:0
Often times when discussing CPUs, features such as the clock speed, number of cores, L2 cache size, and system bus/memory speeds are most frequently mentioned. But one trait that’s often overlooked is the manufacturing process.For a CPU manufacturer li...